| AL_GI | Date: Tuesday, 29-Dec-2015, 8:04 PM | Message # 31 |
 Zombie Pirate
Group: Clan Members
Messages: 1476
Awards: 0
Reputation: 3354
Status: Offline
| This should not even be a question..
Call me "GOD”
︻芫══一 (—_—)
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
| |
| |
| ic3dt3a | Date: Monday, 04-Jan-2016, 1:48 PM | Message # 32 |
 Robotic Ninja
Group: Investor
Messages: 2347
Awards: 1
Reputation: 2723
Status: Offline
| Should we ban players who vote for -ars, yet keep a set hero?
There are also other scenarios
Ars landing you summons and or resurrection hero then voting uim
Rmv while you have a windwalk/blink hero
http://chf.ucoz.com/forum/71-3499-61942-16-1396993348
|
| |
| |
| l3lackownage | Date: Monday, 04-Jan-2016, 2:51 PM | Message # 33 |
 Grunt
Group: Users
Messages: 220
Awards: 0
Reputation: 168
Status: Offline
| ssd then repicking and making hero killer (sarcasm) want everything banned? think about it thats why u got repick , lets say i get perfect uim hero...i vote uim...thats 1 vote...its not instant uim...
that and also when ars is picked, your hero will be auto repicked and spells will be repicked also. you wont get the same spells/hero u had. same thing for RMV its 1 f&*cking vote...like 5 ppl have to vote that s$%t
stop trying to find things to ban god d@#m (directed at everyone who wants stuff banned all the time)
I know ur postulating scenarios and i normally would agree with that. but thinking about scenarios to ban things...its anoyying at least in my opinion. everyone has CHOICES in footies, i can vote yes or no. I can be on this or that team. I can pick this or that spell. if you make f^&cked up choices and it doesnt go your way then i have no pity for that player.
Message edited by l3lackownage - Monday, 04-Jan-2016, 3:26 PM |
| |
| |
| Bio-AssAUlt | Date: Wednesday, 06-Jan-2016, 9:18 AM | Message # 34 |
 Head Administrator
Group: Administrators
Messages: 492
Awards: 0
Reputation: 603
Status: Offline
| So voting ended in a tie.
I will agree with a proceeding post and say that reviewing games to make this scenario bannable will be extremely time consuming and will fall completely on judgement. With the fact that you can whisper and speak via skype, teamspeak, etc... it will be near impossible to prove that every case was done on purpose.
Therefore, this will not be considered bannable moving forward either.
Yes this is clearly abuse but the issue falls down to evidence and ability to prove fault, which I do not see being plausible moving forward.
Again thank you everyone for your input.
|
| |
| |
