You're* Mr. Perfect ACT score, please photoshop more of your personal documents so we think your cool, now please cry to a moderator to delete my post like you do everytime
Message edited by TangerineSky - Sunday, 13-Apr-2014, 10:49 PM
You're* Mr. Perfect ACT score, please photoshop more of your personal documents so we think your cool, now please cry to a moderator to delete my post like you do everytime
I didn't get a "PERFECT" ACT score. Can't do math? I luve mudkipz like you. It's alright. You can be in ur delusional world forever but you might want to check the differences between the numbers. Oh I luv the bullsh1t this forum makes from people I hadn't played for years. Actually, I actually thought Tang quit 2-3 years ago. Wow, new news!
LOL. YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE ELO? No wonder I lost all respect for you. kk, go by ELO. Adam #1
(rofl i cry at the stupidity in this post) Anyways, dont respond to me back tang. Wont answer cause ehh, you just start random dramas on threads that I post to HELP new players win the game. It's quite sad, right? You got nothing to do so first thing you do is cry at me like xmon? kk, keep doing that. keep being pathetic.
Anyways, for those that care about ELO Stick with 1 op build every normal game and stack. This will guarantee you in some kind of high win rate. Just look at incapable players in this forum who are top ELO rank. Pathetic, right?
Stick with 1 op build every normal game and stack. This will guarantee you in some kind of high win rate. Just look at incapable players in this forum who are top ELO rank. Pathetic, right?
The "best" player in chf can win more than 50% of games without....lol.... "op builds." You are not the best; case closed. goodbye I have better arguments to win
The "best" player in chf can win more than 50% of games without....lol.... "op builds." You are not the best; case closed. goodbye I have better arguments to win
Did I claim I was the "best"? LOL, making assumptions now Mr. Smarty pants
"The "best" player in chf can win more than 50%" Uh huh. Uh huh. In general yes. But not always.
Anyways, you can keep arguing but player like Ticklemonster will always know that I'm WAY more than 50% win rate player.
If I actually cared about ELO, I can win most games. 95+% win rate easily. Why I chose not to do it? Cause it's my game. I'm not gonna waste my time perfecting ELO win rate. Anyways, fyi, assasin-bot in past, "ProGlitcher" 32 games, 31 wins, 1 desync (from admin abuser [teammate dc-ed me so that they can see me RAGE about % stay]). And I can guarantee you that me during those days was MUCH worse than me now. So...??
QuoteTangerineSky ()
The "best" player in chf can win more than 50% of games without
The best players don't play at 100% efficiency all the time. The best players let pubs win too. Me from past with 31 wins (32 if you count the DC from team after beating all teams) out of 32 is MUCH less skilled than the me now with 50% win rate
Anyways, this is just like my 1v1 ladder win rate. I go on alts and I get up to 18 wins before I get my first loss. Somehow on my main, I can't even get 50% overall win rate. Kinda hilarious, right? And pretty sure playing 18 games with perfect win rate = vsing MUCH better players than when I am in 50% win rate. REASON: Cause WHY NOT?
